Looks like a Supreme Court member may pay for his decision, in a near-literal sense. I’ll just link to Hit & Run’s post and what are sure to be funny, funny comments.
Yep, this decision has no potential for unconstitutional abuse.
But hey, after reading this roundup of eminent domain proceedings going forward after the decision, there’s an excellent chance that Souter would have been hit by this without sweet, sweet revenge as motivation. Now somebody go after Kennedy’s and Stevens’s pads.